The Sad Truth About WikiLeaks

Readers of this blog may remember I turned against WikiLeaks as soon as I heard Julian Assange was refusing to even look for documents indicating pre-knowledge of 9/11. This certainly wasn’t because such documents don’t exist. In fact, many intelligence agencies sent warnings a major operation against the US was unfolding right before 9/11–just as some politicos may have been warned not to board airplanes that week. So why doesn’t WikiLeaks even want to look under those rocks? Fortunately, Daniel Estulin, who wrote the blockbuster book on Bilderberg, now has a book out titled, Deconstructing WikiLeaks. It’s a fast read and covers more than just the origins of WikiLeaks.

I was happy to see Estulin looked into Daniel Ellsberg as a prelude to  investigating Assange. See, I always thought Ellsberg was a spy and not a true anti-war activist. Real whistleblowers get ignored, while fake whistleblowers end up on the cover of Time magazine. Ellsberg was an assistant to Henry Kissinger, and associate of Edward Lansdale, two of the most obvious Octopus players who have been orchestrating events behind the scenes for the oligarchy. He was a lifelong CIA operative who supposedly had a sudden change of heart and turned against the war and began leaking Rand Corporation studies and reports, a data dump that became known as “The Pentagon Papers” even though these papers had little to do with the Pentagon, and a lot to do with whitewashing the failure of the CIA to provide proper intel about the war and leading the country into a disaster. My theory is the CIA began fomenting many operations against President Richard Nixon shortly after he returned from a surprise visit to China. There’s even a rumor Nixon returned some of the stolen gold from WWII without CIA approval in order to buy his detente move. Turning America against the war could have been part of a CIA master plan to remove Nixon.

Supposedly, Ellsberg transformed into an ardent anti-war activist partially through a chance encounter with Noam Chomsky, another possible Octopus operative who serves as a lightning rod for the left wing. I never trusted Chomsky after I heard his ridiculous views on the Kennedy assassination. I can’t believe educated people insist we don’t know the truth: the CIA fomented the deed with assistance provided by the Texas oil cabal (Hunts and Murchison) and the Chicago Outfit. These facts are known thanks to the Sicilian men-of-honor who spoke out (Roselli, Giancana) and the Cubans who worked for JM/Wave, the CIA’s largest base outside Langley. Few from inside the government have talked, and most of those that have or tried, ended up dead pretty quick.

In 1996, an architect named John Young created a free website for whistleblowers to release secret documents. The site is still around and has over 70,000 documents downloaded. The site is called “Cryptome” and I urge you to check it out. Ten years later, Assange announces his operation and even contacts Young to get him involved in the project. Two things bothered Young immediately: 1) Assange announced he needed to raise $5 million, an outrageous amount of money, way more than necessary to actually set-up and maintain the site, and 2) Assange was taking money from two well-known CIA fronts, Freedom House and the National Endowment for Democracy. Another thing that tipped Young off was Assange’s relentless rhetoric. Eventually, Young wrote a scathing critique of WikiLeaks claiming it was really a money making scam, which it is.

Another suspicious thing about both operations is the way Ellsberg and Assange usually ignore the 800 pound gorilla called illegal drugs, which have played such a vital role in our wars for the last sixty years. Since the illegal drug industry produces between a half a trillion to a trillion dollars per year in tax-free profits, these operations are vital to the stability of our banking system, which uses money-laundered cash from drugs to stay afloat. Yet you seldom find Ellsberg and Assange talking much about opium, even though capturing that monopoly was one of the primary reasons we went to war in both Vietnam and Afghanistan.

So if you’re still one of those people who believe Julian Assange is a “good guy,” please take a look at this just released expose. It might just open your mind to what’s really going on.

Wikileaks and UFOs

I lost all confidence in Julian Assange when he announced 911 was a “fake” conspiracy and there was no need to investigate the tragedy as a possible false-flag attack designed to lead us into war. If he was a real whistle-blower, Assange would be all over 911 because the official story is riddled with serious credibility problems that anyone with half-a-brain can see through.

Now comes the revelation Assange is planning to release explosive evidence regarding UFOs? Oh boy. This is big news, eh? It doesn’t take much imagination to comprehend that  UFO’s are probably the biggest rabbit hole ever created by military intelligence. Just turn on the History Channel and between shows about Hitler and Nazi Germany you’re bound to find tons of UFO specials. We’re constantly being bombarded by nonsense about UFOs and no doubt we may even experience a UFO landing some day. But in all probability, it won’t be real. It’ll be a carefully stage-managed, mind-control event.

I don’t discount the possibility there are energies from other dimensions passing through our reality here on earth. In fact, I’m sure that happens. But I also don’t believe that flying spacecraft from other solar systems inhabited by creatures like us are routinely visiting our planet in secrecy. It’s just too far to travel, and what would be the point of making such a journey in the first place? Even if craft were sent from another world to investigate us, the spaceships would most likely be unmanned drones. And if they were sending unmanned drones, don’t you think making “contact” would be on their to-do list? I mean, why snoop around and be so secretive about it? Why not just announce themselves to the world with a giant display of pyrotechnics? That’s they way our unmanned drones will likely be arriving in another solar system a hundred years or so from now.

To understand Wikileaks, you have to understand that military intelligence will always attempt to control both sides of any conflict. Right now, they have the perfect means to set-up just about anything because they can selectively “leak” fake information, have it posted on Wikileaks, and then get all hot and bothered when it shows up. Not only do I think 911 was a false flag attack, but I believe Wikileaks will probably turn out to be a similar operation.